Compare two Brazilian platforms with different propositions: simple, location-oriented adoption and a complete ecosystem for mature customer experience programs.
Reviewed July 12, 2026 · Editorial comparison based on public information
Choose NPSLab to start quickly with public pricing, mobile operations, and location-based management. Consider Track.co if your company already has a mature CX strategy, multiple journeys and feedback sources, and values expert guidance.
Small and midsize operations, franchises, and networks standardizing customer listening without a long implementation project.
Companies with a structured Voice of Customer program, multiple journeys, and a need for specialized CX services.
There is no universal winner. The best product depends on the survey type, your team’s workflow, and what needs to happen after each response.
| Criterion | NPSLab | Track.co |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption profile | Self-service, from small business to network | Consultative sales and structured CX programs |
| Scope | NPS, CSAT, CES, and satisfaction operations | Voice of Customer and journey management ecosystem |
| Time to start | Direct setup by the team | May include diagnosis and consultative implementation |
| Location management | Plans and views designed by location | Segmentation and analysis for complex operations |
| Feedback treatment | Fast alerts and operational follow-up | Treatment loop within a broad CX strategy |
| Specialist services | Simple product, support, and enterprise option | Consulting and experts within the proposition |
| Commercial information | Pricing published on the site | Contact an expert for a proposal |
A team starting with NPS needs speed and adoption. A mature team may gain more from consulting, multiple sources, and advanced governance.
Include training, setup, integrations, and team time. The license is only part of the decision.
Test collection, alerts, analysis, and closed-loop action at one site before rolling out to the network.
There is overlap, but their positioning differs. NPSLab prioritizes simple adoption and location management; Track.co presents a broad CX ecosystem with expert services.
NPSLab supports self-service onboarding with a free plan and public pricing. Track.co directs purchasing through a conversation with an expert.
Track.co tends to fit multiple journeys, feedback sources, and dedicated CX teams. NPSLab is more direct for standardizing NPS, CSAT, and CES across locations.
Track.co publicly announces the merger and an integrated CX technology and intelligence offering. Because the offer may evolve, confirm the current scope directly with the vendor.
We compared the positioning and features each company describes publicly. We received no payment from the competitor and used no internal access to its products. All cited trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Create your first survey, generate a link or QR code, and validate the workflow with real responses.